Your vision.
Ready for planning.

Planning Policy Context

Development plan status: the development plan comprises the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy (2014) and the Rother Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan (2019). Both are adopted and carry full weight in the determination of this application.

DIM2 — Development Boundaries. New development shall be "focused within defined settlement boundaries"; the site lies inside the Bexhill boundary on the adopted Policies Map, so the principle of a new dwelling here is supported by the spatial strategy, not an exception to it.

S4 — Principle of development within settlements (NPPF). Policy S3(1)(a) directs proposals within settlements to policy S4, under which development "should be approved unless the benefits of doing so would be substantially outweighed by any adverse effects". None of the S4(2) circumstances displaces that presumption here: the site is not allocated or safeguarded for another use in the development plan (S4(2)(a)(i)); it is not existing recreational land (HC7), no Local Green Space designation is recorded for it (HC8), no area of particular importance for biodiversity or geodiversity is recorded (N6), and it is not within a Protected Landscape (N4) — the site is confirmed as outside the AONB. The site is within the residential curtilage of No.150, so the application of L2(1)(d) falls to be considered under S4(2)(a)(ii); no substantial adverse impact arises from developing this curtilage land, because lawful built form and hardstanding already occupy it, the proposal is single-storey and screened from the street, and an Inspector has accepted backland residential development on the immediately abutting land. The site is not a cemetery, burial ground or land used for water storage or flood risk management (S4(2)(b)), and no national decision-making policy requires refusal in these circumstances (S4(2)(c)).

L2 — Making effective use of land (NPPF). L2(1)(b) directs substantial weight to the benefits of making better use of underutilised land and buildings; the scheme converts the existing 51m² outbuilding into part of a completed home and consolidates already-developed garden land into productive residential use.

L3 — Achieving appropriate densities (NPPF). L3(1) requires efficient land use having regard to securing well-designed places; for the reasons given in Design & Appearance, one dwelling is the yield this constrained backland plot can accommodate without repeating the harms that defeated the two-storey scheme.

OSS4 — General Development Considerations. The scheme meets the needs of future occupiers with accessible, step-free accommodation (OSS4(i)); causes no unreasonable harm to adjoining amenity for the elevation-by-elevation reasons given above (OSS4(ii)); respects the character of the locality through its low, screened, subservient form (OSS4(iii)); is compatible with the adjoining residential and care uses (OSS4(iv)); and is of a density appropriate to its context (OSS4(v)).

EN3 — Design Quality. The courtyard composition, contextual materials palette and legible contrast between converted and new elements demonstrate a robust design solution tested against the Key Design Principles, including design in context and architectural quality.

DHG3 — Residential Internal Space Standards. The 163m² gross internal area substantially exceeds the Nationally Described Space Standard minimum for a dwelling of this size and form, with bedroom sizes and storage addressed in the detailed design.

DHG4 — Accessible and Adaptable Homes. All dwellings are required to meet M4(2); the single-storey, level-access design is inherently suited to that standard and the applicant would accept a condition securing it.

DHG7 — External Residential Areas. The 198m² private south-facing garden and 32m² courtyard provide proportionate usable external space; the dimensioned layout will confirm garden depth against the 10m norm, parking and cycle storage are designed in from the outset, and integrated bin storage will be secured.

DHG11 — Boundary Treatments. The 1.8m rendered wall with planted hedging matches the height and domestic character of the existing close-boarded fencing, involves no loss of any structure of historic interest, sits away from the highway, and raises no highway safety issue.

DHG12 — Accesses and Drives. The new shared eastern crossover is acceptable in highway safety terms — the highway authority raised no objection to a larger iteration — replaces the existing arrangement, and is permeably surfaced in accordance with DEN5.

DEN4 — Biodiversity and Green Space. Native planting, bird and bat boxes, the green roof and the east boundary hedging corridor retain and enhance biodiversity appropriate to this suburban context.

DEN5 — Sustainable Drainage. Drainage is integral to the design: a net reduction in impermeable area, source control through permeable construction, green-roof attenuation, and maintenance arrangements to be secured by condition.

SRM1 — Towards a Low Carbon Future. The renewable and fabric-first package set out in the Sustainability section meets and exceeds prevailing energy efficiency standards, exactly as SRM1(ii) encourages; the scheme sits below the SRM1(i) threshold requiring a formal energy strategy.